Education Research Current Organisation and Cooperation NL
Login as
Prospective student Student Employee
Bachelor Master VU for Professionals
Student Desk Exchange programme VU Graduate Winter School Honours programme VU-NT2 Semester in Amsterdam
PhD at VU Amsterdam Research highlights Prizes and distinctions
Research institutes Our scientists Research Impact Support Portal Creating impact
News Events calendar Energy in transition
Israël and Palestinian regions Women at the top Culture on campus
Practical matters Mission and core values Entrepreneurship on VU Campus
Organisation Partnerships Alumni University Library Working at VU Amsterdam
Sorry! De informatie die je zoekt, is enkel beschikbaar in het Engels.
This programme is saved in My Study Choice.
Something went wrong with processing the request.
Something went wrong with processing the request.

Do’s and don’ts for effective peer feedback – part 2

Last updated on 8 April 2024
For effective peer feedback, you need careful design and implementation. How do you ensure a time-saving process with high learning outcomes for your students? We asked Danny Scholten, Education Research Fellow at VU CTL, he is an expert on peer feedback and the use of tools in the process.

He applies cycles of peer feedback in his 4-week project for students. His advice addresses the process dimension of peer feedback, also useful if, as a teacher, you fear that your students are using too much ChatGPT (see our earlier tip on this). We continue with part 2 of our essential do's and don'ts for effective peer feedback!

Want to read part 1 first? Check out the tip here.

Tip 7: convert peer feedback criteria into questions
In tip 5 and 6 of part one, we discussed that it's best to let students work with the real assessment criteria and rubric, of the course. Apart from that it's also a good idea to transform the rubric criteria of your assessment into concrete questions. This way, the focus during peer feedback is on the improvement process and students provide feedback in a meaningful way, rather than just a basic assessment. When presented in the form of questions, students often understand better how to assess a product, and this stimulates them more to think deeply. For example:  

Original rubric text:  

"Context, concepts and reasoning are mostly well explained and substantiated (including references). A mostly clear and critical overview of the literature review and key aspects is given."  

Modified text (by question form):  

"How well are the project's context, concepts and reasoning explained and substantiated (including references)? Does the project present a clear and critical overview of the literature review and key aspects? What went well and what can be improved?" 

Tip 8: let your students give tips and tops per criterion
For your students to give sufficient and effective peer feedback, make sure they name both tips and tops per line of the rubric: 

  • Tips are specific and actionable suggestions or constructive criticism aimed at helping the recipient improve their skills, performance, or work.  
  • Tops are compliments or positive feedback, words of encouragement or recognition for the strengths, achievements, or successful aspects of the recipient's work 

Make sure the students give at least two or three tips and tops per line. You can set up FeedbackFruits to automatically require this from the students. 

Tip 9: students learn most from dialogue about feedback
Remember that students learn most from reflecting on feedback. Therefore, do not skip this step. Build in a reflection step by having students summarise the most important feedback and how they will process it. Try to have them discuss the feedback (face to face) with each other and create a safe environment for students to do so. 

Tip 10: schedule a new practice moment after the peer feedback
Peer feedback is only effective if students actually start working on improving their intermediate product or skills, soon after receiving the feedback. So, make sure that the next step after peer feedback, is the submission of a new product or a new opportunity to practise a skill.   

Tip 11: no need to grade intermediate products 
You don't need to meticulously grade all students' intermediate products during the process; a simple pass or fail is sufficient for this. Extensive feedback from you as a teacher, or giving detailed grades, is not necessary for the intermediate product. During the process, your role is mainly to encourage and guide the students. After they go through every step, you give a more specific final assessment for the definitive product.   

Tip 12: work efficiently with additional tools 
As an additional tip, Danny shares that FeedbackFruits has an option to set minimum requirements for size and other properties of the assignment for final products. And, once students have given feedback, FeedbackFruits now also has an AI system that gives a quality label with Automated Feedback. Finally, FeedbackFruits has very clear teacher dashboards where you can see if students are meeting all the components.   

Teach students to give better peer feedback

Want your students to give better peer feedback? Then share this animation with them. The animation is short, powerful and aimed directly at students.

Quick links

Homepage Culture on campus VU Sports Centre Dashboard

Study

Academic calendar Study guide Timetable Canvas

Featured

VUfonds VU Magazine Ad Valvas

About VU

Contact us Working at VU Amsterdam Faculties Divisions
Privacy Disclaimer Veiligheid Webcolofon Cookies Webarchief

Copyright © 2024 - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam