Ukrainian churches shifted from obedience to resistance during the Revolution of Dignity
Theologian Fedir Raichynets’ research shows how Ukrainian evangelical churches fundamentally revised their interpretation of one of the most influential Bible passages on authority and government during the Revolution of Dignity in 2013 and 2014. Whereas the text from Romans 13 is traditionally seen as a call for obedience to the government, the idea grew during the political crisis that resistance against unjust authority can, in fact, be a moral duty.
Raichynets investigated how evangelical churches in Ukraine dealt with the growing tensions between citizens and the state. In the early phase of the protests, the central question was whether Christians were even permitted to resist the government. As the conflict escalated and state violence against protesters increased, the interpretation of Romans 13 also changed. Increasingly, resistance to injustice was viewed not only as permissible but also as ethically necessary.
According to Raichynets, this shows that religious interpretations are not static but evolve under the influence of social and political circumstances. Within the Ukrainian evangelical community, the crisis led to a shift in emphasis from obedience to political authorities to the defense of human dignity and the fight against injustice.
The research addresses a pressing question facing religious communities worldwide: how should they act when governments clash with fundamental values such as justice, human dignity, and the common good? Raichynets’ findings show that religious beliefs can play a significant role in civic engagement and moral decision-making during times of political tension, war, or authoritarian developments.
In addition, Raichynets’ research offers practical insights for theological education and church leaders. A better understanding of the relationship between faith, state power, and civic responsibility can help religious communities prepare for complex ethical dilemmas. In doing so, he also contributes to the broader debate on a possible “theology of resistance”: the question of under what circumstances resistance to political authorities can be justified both theologically and morally.
More information about the dissertation
