Education Research Current About VU Amsterdam NL
Login as
Prospective student Student Employee
Bachelor Master VU for Professionals
Exchange programme VU Amsterdam Summer School Honours programme VU-NT2 Semester in Amsterdam
PhD at VU Amsterdam Research highlights Prizes and distinctions
Research institutes Our scientists Research Impact Support Portal Creating impact
News Events calendar Biodiversity at VU Amsterdam
Israël and Palestinian regions Culture on campus
Practical matters Mission and core values Entrepreneurship on VU Campus
Organisation Partnerships Alumni University Library Working at VU Amsterdam
Sorry! De informatie die je zoekt, is enkel beschikbaar in het Engels.
This programme is saved in My Study Choice.
Something went wrong with processing the request.
Something went wrong with processing the request.

How does Europe disperse asylum seekers?

Share
15 October 2025
Almost all 32 European countries disperse asylum seekers across locations within their borders, according to research by political scientist and migration scholar Philipp Lutz. A well-designed refugee dispersal policy (RDP) can temper local pressure and NIMBY (“not in my backyard”) reactions, thereby increasing political support for reception.

In the Netherlands, the much-debated Spreidingswet has been in force since 1 February 2024. The aim of this law is to distribute asylum seekers more fairly across the country, as a significant share of Dutch municipalities had not provided asylum accommodation for years. In the current parliamentary elections, several parties state in their manifestos that they want to repeal the law. The reception of refugees thus remains a topical and contested political issue.

This was the reason for political scientist Philipp Lutz, together with co-researcher Walter Bartl, to examine refugee dispersal policies (RDPs) in European countries. Lutz: “There has been little research on how countries actually organise this at the national level. That is why we investigated how the 32 European countries do it.”

Negotiated versus mandatory model
With the exception of one country, all those studied apply some form of dispersal, even when there is no explicit legal framework. How they do so differs. Most countries have a ‘negotiated model’, in which authorities consult and make agreements about the distribution of asylum seekers; no fixed national quotas are imposed from above. Countries with high inflows, such as Germany, more often use a ‘mandatory model’ with quotas and clearly defined responsibilities per region, including sanctions for non-compliance.

Dutch context
“It is striking that the Netherlands - without the Spreidingswet - had the least restrictive dispersal regime among the major Western European refugee-receiving countries,” says Lutz. “At the same time, incidents around sites such as Ter Apel show how important balanced dispersal and transparent communication with local residents are. Our research also points to the risk of NIMBY reactions when strict quotas are to be introduced. Dispersal is therefore an ambivalent policy instrument that requires careful balancing between the interests of the state, local stakeholders and the integration prospects of asylum seekers. Our study shows that it remains a balancing act.”

The full paper is available here.

Contact the VU Press Office

Quick links

Homepage Culture on campus VU Sports Centre Dashboard

Study

Academic calendar Study guide Timetable Canvas

Featured

VUfonds VU Magazine Ad Valvas Digital accessibility

About VU

Contact us Working at VU Amsterdam Faculties Divisions
Privacy Disclaimer Safety Web Colophon Cookie Settings Web Archive

Copyright © 2025 - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam