Education Research Current Organisation and Cooperation NL
Login as
Prospective student Student Employee
Bachelor Master VU for Professionals
Exchange programme VU Graduate Winter School Honours programme VU-NT2 Semester in Amsterdam
PhD at VU Amsterdam Research highlights Prizes and distinctions
Research institutes Our scientists Research Impact Support Portal Creating impact
News Events calendar Energy in transition
Israël and Palestinian regions Women at the top Culture on campus
Practical matters Mission and core values Entrepreneurship on VU Campus
Organisation Partnerships Alumni University Library Working at VU Amsterdam
Sorry! De informatie die je zoekt, is enkel beschikbaar in het Engels.
This programme is saved in My Study Choice.
Something went wrong with processing the request.
Something went wrong with processing the request.

People sensitive to disgust oppose immigration due to resisting foreign norms

2 May 2024
How does disgust affect our social interactions, political views, and appreciation of art? Social psychologist Annika Karinen researched the effect of disgust in her dissertation ‘The Social, Political, and Aesthetic Implications of Disgust’. In this research, Karinen investigates four different implications of disgust: whether people's sensitivity to disgust can be noticed by others, how the tendency to be easily disgusted relates to views on immigration, how disgust sensitivity influences liking of grotesque art, and the heritability of moral attitudes toward casual sex and recreational drugs.

“First, I examined whether a tendency to be highly disgusted by physically disgusting substances, for example, body products or spoiled food, sexual stimuli, or moral offences is detectable by acquaintances, friends, or romantic partners independently of broader personality,” Karinen explains. The research reveals that individuals' levels of disgust sensitivity can indeed be observed by those around them.

The next step for Karinen was to research the effect of disgust on people’s views on immigration. She concludes that sensitivity to disgust plays an important role in shaping opinions on immigration. “People who are highly disgusted by physically disgusting stimuli are more opposed to immigration because they resist the immigrants’ foreign norms – norms that have at least partly evolved to counteract pathogens,” Karinen explains. “These findings help to understand why anti-immigrant sentiments endorsed by certain political parties in Europe and the U.S. are more appealing to some people than others.”

Does disgust sensitivity also have consequences on artistic preferences? Yes, Karinen explains. “We find that men, people who are open to new experiences, sensation seekers, people who are knowledgeable about art, and politically left-leaning individuals tend to like grotesque art, whereas highly emotional and highly disgust sensitive people do not.”

Karinen’s research also shows that attitudes towards casual sex and recreational drugs are partly inherited and share common genetic factors. The findings suggest that moral views on recreational drugs arise from one’s attitudes and preferences toward casual sex. Karinen: “In the last five decades, the financial, social, and political costs and consequences of the war on drugs have been immense. That’s why understanding the factors that shape moral views toward recreational drug use is crucial. My research offers an understanding of why some people morally condemn recreational drug use and others do not.”

Contact the VU Press Office

Quick links

Homepage Culture on campus VU Sports Centre Dashboard

Study

Academic calendar Study guide Timetable Canvas

Featured

VUfonds VU Magazine Ad Valvas

About VU

Contact us Working at VU Amsterdam Faculties Divisions
Privacy Disclaimer Veiligheid Webcolofon Cookies Webarchief

Copyright © 2024 - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam