Visual Pyrometry: Models and Measures of the Visual Brain in Health and Disease
New method provides better insight into brain vision processing
Marcus Daghlian's research into the processing of visual information in the brain shows that existing computer models for brain scans must be interpreted with caution. At the same time, a new method offers opportunities to better measure how the brain copes with impaired vision. This is important for patients receiving treatments to restore their eyesight.
Damage to the eye limits what we can see. Exactly how that damage leads to vision loss also depends on how the brain processes incoming visual information. Therefore, in the study, methods were developed using functional MRI brain scans (fMRI) to measure that processing and to investigate how the brain adapts after eye conditions.
An important finding is that small, easily overlooked changes in computer models can significantly alter the results. When researchers use brain scans to map what someone sees, they must therefore be careful with the interpretation. As a result, previous research results may potentially be less reliable than expected. In addition, Daghlian developed a new method to measure contrast sensitivity: the ability to distinguish subtle differences in shades of gray, for example, to see a gray cat on a dark sidewalk. Standard eye tests primarily measure whether someone can read small black letters on a white map. Contrast sensitivity says more about how well someone can actually see in daily life.
In patients with glaucoma, the new brain scan method made it possible to measure how brain activity decreases when contrast levels drop. This creates better opportunities to monitor how the brain recovers.
Important for vision loss treatments
The results are particularly relevant for new treatments that attempt to restore vision, such as gene therapies and specialized surgeries. After all, improvement of the eye does not automatically mean that vision improves: new visual signals must be interpreted by the brain.
The new methods can help assess whether such treatments actually lead to better functioning vision. They can also provide insight into whether additional training is needed to teach the brain to handle new visual information.
In addition, Daghlian's research contributes to fundamental knowledge about the brain. It can help answer how flexible the brain is after vision loss: is the way the brain processes visual information largely fixed, or can it adapt to a significant extent?
More information on the thesis