Education Research Current About VU Amsterdam NL
Bachelor's programmes Master's programmes VU for Professionals
Exchange programme VU Amsterdam Summer School Honours Programme Dutch language courses (NT2) Semester in Amsterdam
PhD at VU Amsterdam Featured research Prizes and distinctions
Interdisciplinary research institutes Scientists of VU Amsterdam Research Impact Support Portal Create impact with your research
News Events calendar Moving towards a healthier future
VU UPDATE: Situation in Israel and the Palestinian regions Culture at VU Amsterdam
Practical matters Mission, core values and vision Entrepreneurship on VU Campus
Governance of VU Amsterdam Valorisation and impact Partnering with VU Amsterdam VU Alumni Community Take a look at our vacancies!
Sorry! De informatie die je zoekt, is enkel beschikbaar in het Engels.
This programme is saved in My Study Choice.
Something went wrong with processing the request.
Something went wrong with processing the request.

PhD defence C. Meijer

Share

Prophecy and Power

Prophecies as political commentary: insight into the role of future predictions in the Hellenistic Near East

Ancient predictions of the future are often read as religious or mystical texts. Research by historian of antiquity Cindy Meijer shows, however, that they also had a clear political function. By re-examining prophetic texts from Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Judea, her study reveals how closely visions of the future were intertwined with power, kingship, and political crisis in the Hellenistic Near East.

Predicting in times of crisis

Meijer’s research focuses on three texts that describe the future, each originating from a different region. Although they differ in language and context, they share striking similarities. All three show a strong interest in political events, such as international conflicts and the succession of rulers. The central question was whether this political focus was coincidental, or whether political circumstances also played a role in the creation of these texts.

“My conclusion is that political crises directly prompted the writing of these prophecies. The texts reflect periods of instability and uncertainty and articulate expectations of an ideal ruler who would restore order and justice. Prophecy thus functioned as a way to interpret contemporary political tensions and to offer hope for change,” Meijer explains.

Daniel and Babylon: more closely connected than previously thought

A key finding of the research is a reassessment of the relationship between the biblical text Daniel 11 and the Babylonian Dynasties Prophecy. Where earlier scholarship mainly pointed to general similarities, Meijer demonstrates that the parallels are so specific that they indicate direct literary influence. This suggests that the author of Daniel 11 drew inspiration from existing Mesopotamian prophetic traditions.

This leads to the identification of a broader literary genre in which “prophecies after the fact”—descriptions of events that had already occurred—are combined with a genuine expectation of the future: the arrival of a savior king. The Dynasties Prophecy emerges as a key example of this genre, and Daniel 11 fits convincingly within it.

Between Greek influence and local identity

Meijer’s research also sheds light on a tension that feels surprisingly contemporary: the tension between foreign cultural influence and local identity. In some texts, such as the Egyptian Potter’s Oracle, Greek and Hellenized inhabitants of Alexandria are sharply criticized. At the same time, the text is written in Greek and shows clear influences from Greek historiography.

This combination of rejection and appropriation of a dominant culture illustrates how societies negotiate power and identity in times of change. The study shows that this is not a modern phenomenon, but one that already existed in antiquity—an insight that is also relevant to present-day debates on globalization, cultural influence, and resistance to it.

Ancient texts, new insights

By reading prophetic literature not only through a religious lens but also as political texts, Meijer’s research offers a fresh perspective on well-known sources. It demonstrates how predictions of the future were used as social tools to make sense of crisis, express criticism, and articulate hope. In doing so, the study underscores the enduring value of ancient texts for understanding political and cultural dynamics, both past and present.

More information on the thesis

Programme

PhD defence by C. Meijer

PhD Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities

Supervisors:

  • prof.dr. R.B. ter Haar Romeny
  • prof.dr. K. Kleber
  • prof.dr. R. Müller

The PhD defence can be followed online as well

About PhD defence C. Meijer

Starting date

  • 13 February 2026

Time

  • 11:45 - 13:15

Location

  • Main building VU, Aula

Address

  • De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam

Follow the ceremony online

Go to livestream

Quick links

Homepage VU Amsterdam Culture at VU Amsterdam University Library Dashboard

Study

Academic calendar Study Guide Timetable Canvas

Featured

Donate to the VU Fund VU Magazine Ad Valvas Digital accessibility

About VU Amsterdam

Contact with VU Amsterdam Take a look at our vacancies! Faculties VU Amsterdam Divisions VU Amsterdam
Privacy Disclaimer Safety Web Colophon Cookie settings Web Archive

Copyright © VU