Education Research Current Organisation and Cooperation NL
Login as
Prospective student Student Employee
Bachelor Master VU for Professionals
Student Desk Exchange programme VU Graduate Winter School Honours programme VU-NT2 Semester in Amsterdam
PhD at VU Amsterdam Research highlights Prizes and distinctions
Research institutes Our scientists Research Impact Support Portal Creating impact
News Events calendar Energy in transition
Israël and Palestinian regions Women at the top Culture on campus
Practical matters Mission and core values Entrepreneurship on VU Campus
Organisation Partnerships Alumni University Library Working at VU Amsterdam
Sorry! De informatie die je zoekt, is enkel beschikbaar in het Engels.
This programme is saved in My Study Choice.
Something went wrong with processing the request.
Something went wrong with processing the request.

Neural Models of Cognitive Processes

Neural Models of Cognitive Processes

Computational modelling is an important tool for cognitive neuroscience. Conversely, neuroscience has proven to be a very rich source of inspiration for AI. This course will teach you the background knowledge on the core principles of computational modelling, and dive into the links between AI and (cognitive) neuroscience.

Course Description

Course Objective

Computational modelling is an important tool for cognitive neuroscience. Conversely, neuroscience has proven to be a very rich source of inspiration for AI. This course will teach you the background knowledge on the core principles of computational modelling, and dive into the links between AI and (cognitive) neuroscience.

The course is intended to offer insight(s) into what different types of models exist in in cognitive neuroscience, how they can be (and are) used to enrich the field, and it explores what questions arise when evaluating modelling work in this field. We will also investigate the parallels between current issues in computational cognitive neuroscience and open questions in AI.

Course Content

Computational models are an important tool in cognitive neuroscience. A large branch of research focuses on an experimental approach, testing

predictions by means of carefully designed experiments. Models, on the other hand, can integrate experimental results into complete and detailed theories that produce testable predictions. As such, they form a critical step in the empirical cycle by generating predictions for future experiments.

When used appropriately, a model allows for the integration of findings from a wide range of experiments. Rather than merely verbal theories, computational models are rich in detail and allow for a mechanistic view on how the brain produces its behavior.

An old adage from statistics is that ``all models are wrong, but some models are useful''. They are wrong because a model by definition is a simplification of reality, but they are useful when they generate testable predictions. However, it can be difficult to assess whether a model is too much of a simplification, and whether its predictions actually are useful. What makes a model good or bad? To what extent do models need to fit the data? And if multiple models fit the data, how do we choose which is the `better one'?

In addition, modeling papers can at times seem rather enigmatic, and for the untrained reader it is all too easy to get lost in the mathematical equations that make up computational models.

This course takes a learn-by-example approach to give an overview of different modeling approaches that are common in neuroscience. We will start at a high level of abstraction, with models that are used to mathematically describe experimental data, with relatively little regard

for their implementation in the brain. By means of practical sessions, you will get hands-on experience with some of these models and see how they are implemented. By means of debates, you will learn how to assess different models in terms of their strengths and weaknesses. Lastly, you will listen to neuroscience/AI podcast episodes, and present one highlighted researcher's work in class.

Additional Information Teaching Methods

Lectures and discussion, computer tutorial and practicals.

Method of Assessment

Grades are based on a weighted average of performance on a final exam (60%), weekly quizzes (15%), and class participation in the debate sessions (Perusall 10%, Podcast presentations 15%)

Entry Requirements

There is no explicit required knowledge. However, as the practicals have you work with Python code, it might be useful to familiarize oneself with the language. https://www.codecademy.com/learn/python offers a wonderful free online tutorial

Literature

Literature (articles, tutorials) will be provided through Canvas & Perusall.

Study Characteristics

  • Name of teacher: Tomas Knapen
  • Language: English
  • ECTS: 6
  • Period: period 2 at every odd year (Nov-Dec)
  • Available to: Graduate / Master’s students in AI, Computational Science, Bioinformatics, etc.
  • Maximum number of students: 60
  • Number of lessons: 14
  • Anticipated hrs of study: 180
  • Concluding assessment: Exam, reading assignment, presentation
  • Admission criteria: Knowledge of Python
  • Course Description & Study Characteristics

    Course Description

    Course Objective

    Computational modelling is an important tool for cognitive neuroscience. Conversely, neuroscience has proven to be a very rich source of inspiration for AI. This course will teach you the background knowledge on the core principles of computational modelling, and dive into the links between AI and (cognitive) neuroscience.

    The course is intended to offer insight(s) into what different types of models exist in in cognitive neuroscience, how they can be (and are) used to enrich the field, and it explores what questions arise when evaluating modelling work in this field. We will also investigate the parallels between current issues in computational cognitive neuroscience and open questions in AI.

    Course Content

    Computational models are an important tool in cognitive neuroscience. A large branch of research focuses on an experimental approach, testing

    predictions by means of carefully designed experiments. Models, on the other hand, can integrate experimental results into complete and detailed theories that produce testable predictions. As such, they form a critical step in the empirical cycle by generating predictions for future experiments.

    When used appropriately, a model allows for the integration of findings from a wide range of experiments. Rather than merely verbal theories, computational models are rich in detail and allow for a mechanistic view on how the brain produces its behavior.

    An old adage from statistics is that ``all models are wrong, but some models are useful''. They are wrong because a model by definition is a simplification of reality, but they are useful when they generate testable predictions. However, it can be difficult to assess whether a model is too much of a simplification, and whether its predictions actually are useful. What makes a model good or bad? To what extent do models need to fit the data? And if multiple models fit the data, how do we choose which is the `better one'?

    In addition, modeling papers can at times seem rather enigmatic, and for the untrained reader it is all too easy to get lost in the mathematical equations that make up computational models.

    This course takes a learn-by-example approach to give an overview of different modeling approaches that are common in neuroscience. We will start at a high level of abstraction, with models that are used to mathematically describe experimental data, with relatively little regard

    for their implementation in the brain. By means of practical sessions, you will get hands-on experience with some of these models and see how they are implemented. By means of debates, you will learn how to assess different models in terms of their strengths and weaknesses. Lastly, you will listen to neuroscience/AI podcast episodes, and present one highlighted researcher's work in class.

    Additional Information Teaching Methods

    Lectures and discussion, computer tutorial and practicals.

    Method of Assessment

    Grades are based on a weighted average of performance on a final exam (60%), weekly quizzes (15%), and class participation in the debate sessions (Perusall 10%, Podcast presentations 15%)

    Entry Requirements

    There is no explicit required knowledge. However, as the practicals have you work with Python code, it might be useful to familiarize oneself with the language. https://www.codecademy.com/learn/python offers a wonderful free online tutorial

    Literature

    Literature (articles, tutorials) will be provided through Canvas & Perusall.

    Study Characteristics

    • Name of teacher: Tomas Knapen
    • Language: English
    • ECTS: 6
    • Period: period 2 at every odd year (Nov-Dec)
    • Available to: Graduate / Master’s students in AI, Computational Science, Bioinformatics, etc.
    • Maximum number of students: 60
    • Number of lessons: 14
    • Anticipated hrs of study: 180
    • Concluding assessment: Exam, reading assignment, presentation
    • Admission criteria: Knowledge of Python

Quick links

Homepage Culture on campus VU Sports Centre Dashboard

Study

Academic calendar Study guide Timetable Canvas

Featured

VUfonds VU Magazine Ad Valvas

About VU

Contact us Working at VU Amsterdam Faculties Divisions
Privacy Disclaimer Veiligheid Webcolofon Cookies Webarchief

Copyright © 2024 - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam