BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam//NONSGML v1.0//EN
NAME:PhD defence C. Braaksma
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20260612T114500
DTEND:20260612T131500
DTSTAMP:20260612T114500
UID:2026/phd-defence-c-braaksma@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573
CREATED:20260613T045026
LOCATION:Hoofdgebouw, Aula De Boelelaan 
 1105 1081 HV  Amsterdam
SUMMARY:PhD defence C. Braaksma
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <html> <body> <p>Measuring patient-repor
 ted physical function and pain in total hip and knee arthroplasty</p>
  <h3>Current mandatory questionnaires in hip and knee replacement pat
 ients have limitations in their measurement quality</h3><p>Orthopedic
  surgeon-in-training Christel Braaksma examined the psychometric prop
 erties of currently used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) fo
 r measuring physical functioning and pain in patients receiving total
  hip replacement (THP) or total knee replacement (TKP). In addition, 
 she compared a new innovative measurement method called Patient-Repor
 ted Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) to traditional
  PROMs. Braaksma also examined the external validation of conversion 
 tables (crosswalks) between traditional PROMs and PROMIS measurement 
 instruments.</p><p>The main finding of this dissertation is that the 
 current PROMs that are mandatorily administered at THP and TKP have l
 imitations in their measurement properties. Inaccurate measurements p
 lace an unnecessary burden on both patients and caregivers, and relia
 nce on data with limited validity can lead to incorrect clinical deci
 sion-making. The innovative alternative, PROMIS, seems more appropria
 te for assessing individual patients by being less burdensome and off
 ering a broader range of measurement. When switching from traditional
  PROMs to PROMIS measurements, existing crosswalks can be used at the
  group level for data continuity from historical measurements.</p><p>
 Both patients and healthcare providers need accurate assessments that
  support the use of PROM data in research and inform policy developme
 nt. However, despite the potential benefits, numerous challenges rema
 in in selecting and implementing the most appropriate PROMs in practi
 ce. Failure to use the most appropriate PROMs leads to less efficient
  and less patient-centered care.</p><p>Learn more about the <a href="
 https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/9f359a8f-c52d-4845-b67a-8e6a579ec63f" d
 ata-new-window="true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">disse
 rtation</a></p> </body> </html>
DESCRIPTION: <h3>Current mandatory questionnaires in hip and knee repl
 acement patients have limitations in their measurement quality</h3> O
 rthopedic surgeon-in-training Christel Braaksma examined the psychome
 tric properties of currently used patient-reported outcome measures (
 PROMs) for measuring physical functioning and pain in patients receiv
 ing total hip replacement (THP) or total knee replacement (TKP). In a
 ddition, she compared a new innovative measurement method called Pati
 ent-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) to tr
 aditional PROMs. Braaksma also examined the external validation of co
 nversion tables (crosswalks) between traditional PROMs and PROMIS mea
 surement instruments. The main finding of this dissertation is that t
 he current PROMs that are mandatorily administered at THP and TKP hav
 e limitations in their measurement properties. Inaccurate measurement
 s place an unnecessary burden on both patients and caregivers, and re
 liance on data with limited validity can lead to incorrect clinical d
 ecision-making. The innovative alternative, PROMIS, seems more approp
 riate for assessing individual patients by being less burdensome and 
 offering a broader range of measurement. When switching from traditio
 nal PROMs to PROMIS measurements, existing crosswalks can be used at 
 the group level for data continuity from historical measurements. Bot
 h patients and healthcare providers need accurate assessments that su
 pport the use of PROM data in research and inform policy development.
  However, despite the potential benefits, numerous challenges remain 
 in selecting and implementing the most appropriate PROMs in practice.
  Failure to use the most appropriate PROMs leads to less efficient an
 d less patient-centered care. Learn more about the <a href="https://h
 dl.handle.net/1871.1/9f359a8f-c52d-4845-b67a-8e6a579ec63f" data-new-w
 indow="true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">dissertation</
 a> Measuring patient-reported physical function and pain in total hip
  and knee arthroplasty
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
