BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam//NONSGML v1.0//EN
NAME:PhD defence X. Luo
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20261112T134500
DTEND:20261112T151500
DTSTAMP:20261112T134500
UID:phd-defense-x-luo@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573
CREATED:20261105T064433
LOCATION:Main building VU, 1105, Aula, De Boelelaan, 1081 HV, Amsterdam
SUMMARY:PhD defence X. Luo
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <html> <body> <p><p>The Interpretive Nat
 ure of Coopetition: From CEO Temporal Cognition to Investor Evaluatio
 n</p></p> <h3><strong>Collaborating with Competitors Pays Off, but No
 t Always</strong></h3><p>Collaborating with competitors can help comp
 anies share knowledge, reduce innovation risks, and develop new produ
 cts or technologies. However, research by organizational scientist Xi
 ya Luo shows that more collaboration isn’t automatically better. In
 vestors respond most positively when collaborations with competitors 
 make up a moderate portion of a company’s total partnerships.</p><p
 >Circumstances also play an important role. In stable times, collabor
 ation with competitors is associated with stronger growth in the valu
 ation of innovation. During the COVID-19 crisis, that benefit was muc
 h smaller. Investors therefore seem to assess such collaborations dif
 ferently in uncertain times.</p><p>Luo’s research shows that compan
 ies must not only carefully consider the extent of their collaboratio
 n with competitors but also how they explain the purpose and risks of
  such collaborations to investors. This is particularly relevant now 
 that companies are increasingly relying on collaboration - including 
 with parties with whom they also compete- to tackle major innovation 
 challenges.</p><p>More information about the <a href="https://hdl.han
 dle.net/1871.1/bc5e27a4-8738-4fd7-aa90-f4b806035515">dissertation</a>
 .</p> </body> </html>
DESCRIPTION: The Interpretive Nature of Coopetition: From CEO Temporal
  Cognition to Investor Evaluation <h3><strong>Collaborating with Comp
 etitors Pays Off, but Not Always</strong></h3>Collaborating with comp
 etitors can help companies share knowledge, reduce innovation risks, 
 and develop new products or technologies. However, research by organi
 zational scientist Xiya Luo shows that more collaboration isn’t aut
 omatically better. Investors respond most positively when collaborati
 ons with competitors make up a moderate portion of a company’s tota
 l partnerships.Circumstances also play an important role. In stable t
 imes, collaboration with competitors is associated with stronger grow
 th in the valuation of innovation. During the COVID-19 crisis, that b
 enefit was much smaller. Investors therefore seem to assess such coll
 aborations differently in uncertain times.Luo’s research shows that
  companies must not only carefully consider the extent of their colla
 boration with competitors but also how they explain the purpose and r
 isks of such collaborations to investors. This is particularly releva
 nt now that companies are increasingly relying on collaboration - inc
 luding with parties with whom they also compete- to tackle major inno
 vation challenges.More information about the <a href="https://hdl.han
 dle.net/1871.1/bc5e27a4-8738-4fd7-aa90-f4b806035515">dissertation</a>
 .
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
