BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam//NONSGML v1.0//EN
NAME:ABRI Lunch Seminar Andreas Eckhard
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20260203T120000
DTEND:20260203T130000
DTSTAMP:20260203T120000
UID:abri-lunch-seminar-andreas-eck@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573
CREATED:20260924T213341
LOCATION:VU Main Building, 1105, De Boelelaan, 1081 HV, Amsterdam
SUMMARY:ABRI Lunch Seminar Andreas Eckhard
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <html> <body> <p><p>We are happy to invi
 te you to the ABRI Lunch Seminar Virtuous and Vicious Self-Governance
  Practices: Mechanisms of Moral Formation Through Personal Data Routi
 nes via Wearables by prof. Andreas Eckhardt (Department of Informatio
 n Systems, Production and Logistics Management, University of Innsbru
 ck).</p></p> <p>The seminar will take place on Tuesday, February 3rd,
  from 12:00 to 13:00 (HG-06A37). You can find more information below.
  It has been organized by ABRI and the KIN Center for Digital Innovat
 ion.<br><br>This is a lunch seminar; please register your attendance 
 by accepting/declining your emailed invitation by Friday, January 30t
 h, at 10 AM at the latest (for catering).<br><br><strong>Abstract</st
 rong><br>Consumer wearables enable self-governance practices that sha
 pe how users understand and manage themselves through data, producing
  subjectivities. These subjectivities embody identities characterized
  by moral dispositions: some users exhibit disciplined, health-promot
 ing conduct, whereas others display compulsive data routines that und
 ermine well-being. Although IS research recognizes that personal data
  digitalization has normative implications, the mechanisms by which s
 elf-governance practices morally form users into distinct subjectivit
 ies remain theoretically underspecified. Drawing on Vallor's virtue e
 thics, we model the recursive relationship between self-governance pr
 actices and moral dispositions, conceptualized as virtues and vices. 
 Using this model, we analyze semi-structured interviews with 50 weara
 ble users and identify three subjectivities, characterized by distinc
 t dispositional configurations: Devotee, Challenger, and Calibrator. 
 We theorize three mechanisms that drive moral formation: transfusion 
 (importing external dispositions), transposition (cultivating new dis
 positions through device use), and transmutation (oscillating between
  a virtuous disposition and its vices of deficiency or excess). These
  mechanisms operate in a salience hierarchy (primary, secondary, tert
 iary) that differs across each subjectivity, explaining why self-gove
 rnance practices persist or change. Our study contributes to IS resea
 rch by showing how personal data digitalization has normative ramific
 ations through three distinct mechanisms, how it co-constitutes subje
 ctivities that embody morally laden identities, and why similar devic
 es produce divergent engagement patterns and well-being outcomes. Pra
 ctically, we propose interventions targeting each mechanism that chal
 lenge the ideology of continuous improvement embedded in wearables an
 d show when stepping back from self-improvement better supports flour
 ishing.</p> </body> </html>
DESCRIPTION: We are happy to invite you to the ABRI Lunch Seminar Virt
 uous and Vicious Self-Governance Practices: Mechanisms of Moral Forma
 tion Through Personal Data Routines via Wearables by prof. Andreas Ec
 khardt (Department of Information Systems, Production and Logistics M
 anagement, University of Innsbruck). The seminar will take place on T
 uesday, February 3rd, from 12:00 to 13:00 (HG-06A37). You can find mo
 re information below. It has been organized by ABRI and the KIN Cente
 r for Digital Innovation.<br><br>This is a lunch seminar; please regi
 ster your attendance by accepting/declining your emailed invitation b
 y Friday, January 30th, at 10 AM at the latest (for catering).<br><br
 ><strong>Abstract</strong><br>Consumer wearables enable self-governan
 ce practices that shape how users understand and manage themselves th
 rough data, producing subjectivities. These subjectivities embody ide
 ntities characterized by moral dispositions: some users exhibit disci
 plined, health-promoting conduct, whereas others display compulsive d
 ata routines that undermine well-being. Although IS research recogniz
 es that personal data digitalization has normative implications, the 
 mechanisms by which self-governance practices morally form users into
  distinct subjectivities remain theoretically underspecified. Drawing
  on Vallor's virtue ethics, we model the recursive relationship betwe
 en self-governance practices and moral dispositions, conceptualized a
 s virtues and vices. Using this model, we analyze semi-structured int
 erviews with 50 wearable users and identify three subjectivities, cha
 racterized by distinct dispositional configurations: Devotee, Challen
 ger, and Calibrator. We theorize three mechanisms that drive moral fo
 rmation: transfusion (importing external dispositions), transposition
  (cultivating new dispositions through device use), and transmutation
  (oscillating between a virtuous disposition and its vices of deficie
 ncy or excess). These mechanisms operate in a salience hierarchy (pri
 mary, secondary, tertiary) that differs across each subjectivity, exp
 laining why self-governance practices persist or change. Our study co
 ntributes to IS research by showing how personal data digitalization 
 has normative ramifications through three distinct mechanisms, how it
  co-constitutes subjectivities that embody morally laden identities, 
 and why similar devices produce divergent engagement patterns and wel
 l-being outcomes. Practically, we propose interventions targeting eac
 h mechanism that challenge the ideology of continuous improvement emb
 edded in wearables and show when stepping back from self-improvement 
 better supports flourishing.
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
