BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam//NONSGML v1.0//EN
NAME:PhD defense D.C. Kieslinger
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20260513T094500
DTEND:20260513T111500
DTSTAMP:20260513T094500
UID:2026/phd-defense-d-c-kieslinge@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573
CREATED:20260512T081453
LOCATION:(1st floor) Auditorium, Main building De Boelelaan 1105 1081 HV Amsterdam
SUMMARY:PhD defense D.C. Kieslinger
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <html> <body> <p>Development of Assisted
  Reproductive Technology Innovations</p> <h3>New IVF Technique Does N
 ot Increase Pregnancy Chance, But Costs More</h3><p>Multiple embryos 
 are often created during IVF treatment. The laboratory must then dete
 rmine which embryo offers the greatest chance of pregnancy. Normally,
  embryos are removed from the incubator daily for this purpose to be 
 examined under a microscope. This can disrupt the culture conditions.
 </p><p>Increasingly, IVF laboratories are using so-called time-lapse 
 incubators: incubators with built-in cameras that continuously monito
 r the development of embryos. As a result, embryos no longer need to 
 be removed from their stable environment. Using computer algorithms o
 r artificial intelligence, these images are analyzed to select an emb
 ryo. For a long time, it was thought that this technique would increa
 se the chance of pregnancy, but evidence for this was lacking.</p><p>
 This PhD research shows that this expectation is incorrect. Continuou
 sly monitoring embryos with a camera and culturing them in a time-lap
 se incubator does not lead to a higher chance of pregnancy within one
  year. Nor do patients get pregnant faster than with standard treatme
 nt. The method is safe for mother and child, but it entails additiona
 l costs. The findings are important because innovations in fertility 
 care are sometimes introduced before it is clear whether they actuall
 y work better. High expectations and hype play a role in this. Hospit
 als invest heavily in this type of technology, while those investment
 s do not always lead to better results for patients. This research un
 derscores how important it is to thoroughly investigate and criticall
 y evaluate new technologies before they are widely adopted. Only in t
 his way can unnecessary costs be avoided and care remain affordable i
 n the future.</p><p>More information on the <a href="https://hdl.hand
 le.net/1871.1/7c1b4e96-b142-4642-9b6f-3e2aeeed9d74" data-new-window="
 true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">thesis</a></p> </body
 > </html>
DESCRIPTION: <h3>New IVF Technique Does Not Increase Pregnancy Chance,
  But Costs More</h3> Multiple embryos are often created during IVF tr
 eatment. The laboratory must then determine which embryo offers the g
 reatest chance of pregnancy. Normally, embryos are removed from the i
 ncubator daily for this purpose to be examined under a microscope. Th
 is can disrupt the culture conditions. Increasingly, IVF laboratories
  are using so-called time-lapse incubators: incubators with built-in 
 cameras that continuously monitor the development of embryos. As a re
 sult, embryos no longer need to be removed from their stable environm
 ent. Using computer algorithms or artificial intelligence, these imag
 es are analyzed to select an embryo. For a long time, it was thought 
 that this technique would increase the chance of pregnancy, but evide
 nce for this was lacking. This PhD research shows that this expectati
 on is incorrect. Continuously monitoring embryos with a camera and cu
 lturing them in a time-lapse incubator does not lead to a higher chan
 ce of pregnancy within one year. Nor do patients get pregnant faster 
 than with standard treatment. The method is safe for mother and child
 , but it entails additional costs. The findings are important because
  innovations in fertility care are sometimes introduced before it is 
 clear whether they actually work better. High expectations and hype p
 lay a role in this. Hospitals invest heavily in this type of technolo
 gy, while those investments do not always lead to better results for 
 patients. This research underscores how important it is to thoroughly
  investigate and critically evaluate new technologies before they are
  widely adopted. Only in this way can unnecessary costs be avoided an
 d care remain affordable in the future. More information on the <a hr
 ef="https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/7c1b4e96-b142-4642-9b6f-3e2aeeed9d7
 4" data-new-window="true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">t
 hesis</a> Development of Assisted Reproductive Technology Innovations
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
