BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam//NONSGML v1.0//EN
NAME:Inaugural lecture prof.dr. F. van Horen
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20260123T154500
DTEND:20260123T171500
DTSTAMP:20260123T154500
UID:2026/inaugural-lecture-prof-dr@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573
CREATED:20260410T170342
LOCATION:Hoofdgebouw, Aula De Boelelaan 
 1105 1081 HV  Amsterdam
SUMMARY:Inaugural lecture prof.dr. F. van Horen
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <html> <body> <p>Paradigm Shifts in Unde
 rstanding Consumers: From Fixed Assumptions to Contextual Realities</
 p> <p>Consumers often behave differently than we expect. Their choice
 s are strongly influenced by the situation and are sometimes even irr
 ational. When we realize that reality often works differently than we
  think, it forces us to reconsider our fixed assumptions. In her inau
 gural lecture, Professor of Consumer Behavior Femke van Horen demonst
 rates how assumptions in trademark law and business need to be re-exa
 mined.</p><p>Van Horen demonstrates, for example, that - contrary to 
 prevailing belief - more similarity isn't always better: when packagi
 ng (such as Freeway Cola) or a radical innovation (such as a plant-ba
 sed steak or a robot) too closely resembles something we already know
  (Coca-Cola, beef steak, humans), consumers actually judge it more ne
 gatively. Too close is counterproductive. These insights demonstrate 
 that those who cling to fixed ideas miss how consumers actually react
  in practice. In an age of populism, openness and adaptability are es
 sential.</p> </body> </html>
DESCRIPTION: Consumers often behave differently than we expect. Their 
 choices are strongly influenced by the situation and are sometimes ev
 en irrational. When we realize that reality often works differently t
 han we think, it forces us to reconsider our fixed assumptions. In he
 r inaugural lecture, Professor of Consumer Behavior Femke van Horen d
 emonstrates how assumptions in trademark law and business need to be 
 re-examined. Van Horen demonstrates, for example, that - contrary to 
 prevailing belief - more similarity isn't always better: when packagi
 ng (such as Freeway Cola) or a radical innovation (such as a plant-ba
 sed steak or a robot) too closely resembles something we already know
  (Coca-Cola, beef steak, humans), consumers actually judge it more ne
 gatively. Too close is counterproductive. These insights demonstrate 
 that those who cling to fixed ideas miss how consumers actually react
  in practice. In an age of populism, openness and adaptability are es
 sential. Paradigm Shifts in Understanding Consumers: From Fixed Assum
 ptions to Contextual Realities
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
