BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam//NONSGML v1.0//EN
NAME:PhD defence C. Braaksma
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20260612T114500
DTEND:20260612T131500
DTSTAMP:20260612T114500
UID:phd-defence-c-braaksma@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573
CREATED:20260922T095728
LOCATION:Main building VU, 1105, Aula, De Boelelaan, 1081 HV, Amsterdam
SUMMARY:PhD defence C. Braaksma
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <html> <body> <p><p>Measuring patient-re
 ported physical function and pain in total hip and knee arthroplasty<
 /p></p> <h3>Current mandatory questionnaires in hip and knee replacem
 ent patients have limitations in their measurement quality</h3><p>Ort
 hopedic surgeon-in-training Christel Braaksma examined the psychometr
 ic properties of currently used patient-reported outcome measures (PR
 OMs) for measuring physical functioning and pain in patients receivin
 g total hip replacement (THP) or total knee replacement (TKP). In add
 ition, she compared a new innovative measurement method called Patien
 t-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) to trad
 itional PROMs. Braaksma also examined the external validation of conv
 ersion tables (crosswalks) between traditional PROMs and PROMIS measu
 rement instruments.</p><p>The main finding of this dissertation is th
 at the current PROMs that are mandatorily administered at THP and TKP
  have limitations in their measurement properties. Inaccurate measure
 ments place an unnecessary burden on both patients and caregivers, an
 d reliance on data with limited validity can lead to incorrect clinic
 al decision-making. The innovative alternative, PROMIS, seems more ap
 propriate for assessing individual patients by being less burdensome 
 and offering a broader range of measurement. When switching from trad
 itional PROMs to PROMIS measurements, existing crosswalks can be used
  at the group level for data continuity from historical measurements.
 </p><p>Both patients and healthcare providers need accurate assessmen
 ts that support the use of PROM data in research and inform policy de
 velopment. However, despite the potential benefits, numerous challeng
 es remain in selecting and implementing the most appropriate PROMs in
  practice. Failure to use the most appropriate PROMs leads to less ef
 ficient and less patient-centered care.</p><p>Learn more about the <a
  href="https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/9f359a8f-c52d-4845-b67a-8e6a579e
 c63f" data-new-window="true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer
 ">dissertation</a></p> </body> </html>
DESCRIPTION: Measuring patient-reported physical function and pain in 
 total hip and knee arthroplasty <h3>Current mandatory questionnaires 
 in hip and knee replacement patients have limitations in their measur
 ement quality</h3>Orthopedic surgeon-in-training Christel Braaksma ex
 amined the psychometric properties of currently used patient-reported
  outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring physical functioning and pain
  in patients receiving total hip replacement (THP) or total knee repl
 acement (TKP). In addition, she compared a new innovative measurement
  method called Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Syst
 em (PROMIS®) to traditional PROMs. Braaksma also examined the extern
 al validation of conversion tables (crosswalks) between traditional P
 ROMs and PROMIS measurement instruments.The main finding of this diss
 ertation is that the current PROMs that are mandatorily administered 
 at THP and TKP have limitations in their measurement properties. Inac
 curate measurements place an unnecessary burden on both patients and 
 caregivers, and reliance on data with limited validity can lead to in
 correct clinical decision-making. The innovative alternative, PROMIS,
  seems more appropriate for assessing individual patients by being le
 ss burdensome and offering a broader range of measurement. When switc
 hing from traditional PROMs to PROMIS measurements, existing crosswal
 ks can be used at the group level for data continuity from historical
  measurements.Both patients and healthcare providers need accurate as
 sessments that support the use of PROM data in research and inform po
 licy development. However, despite the potential benefits, numerous c
 hallenges remain in selecting and implementing the most appropriate P
 ROMs in practice. Failure to use the most appropriate PROMs leads to 
 less efficient and less patient-centered care.Learn more about the <a
  href="https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/9f359a8f-c52d-4845-b67a-8e6a579e
 c63f" data-new-window="true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer
 ">dissertation</a>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
