BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam//NONSGML v1.0//EN
NAME:Psychological Safety Across Cultures and Contexts
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20260929T090000
DTEND:20260930T173000
DTSTAMP:20260929T090000
UID:psychological-safety-across-cu@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573
CREATED:20260911T082143
LOCATION:Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1105, School of Business and Economics for Professionals, De Boelelaan, 1081 HV, AMSTERDAM
SUMMARY:Psychological Safety Across Cultures and Contexts
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <html> <body> <p><p>We are excited to an
 nounce that the international conference&nbsp;Psychological Safety Ac
 ross Cultures and Contexts&nbsp;will be held in Amsterdam on 29–30 
 September 2026.</p></p> <h3>Keynote Speaker<br></h3><p><strong>Amy Ed
 mondson (Harvard Business School)</strong><br><br><br>This conference
  aims to advance contemporary thinking on psychological safety by exa
 mining its cultural foundations and its relevance across diverse orga
 nizational and societal contexts. We invite researchers from around t
 he world working on psychological safety to submit and present their 
 research.<br><strong>Important Dates</strong></p><ul>  <li>Submission
  deadline for Abstracts (1000 words):&nbsp;30 May 2026</li>  <li>Noti
 fication of acceptance:&nbsp;15 June 2026</li>  <li>Submission deadli
 ne for Full Papers: 1 September 2026</li>  <li>Conference dates:&nbsp
 ;29–30 September 2026</li></ul><p><br></p><h3><strong>Submission De
 tails</strong></h3><p>Please submit your abstracts by sending them to
  &nbsp;<a data-email-address="leadershipacademy@vu.nl" href="mailto:l
 eadershipacademy@vu.nl">leadershipacademy@vu.nl</a></p><p><br></p><p>
 <strong>Background and Motivation</strong></p><p>Creating psychologic
 ally safe environments for employees is widely regarded as a central 
 priority in contemporary organizations. Psychological safety, defined
  as a shared belief about the consequences of taking interpersonal ri
 sks in a given context (Edmondson, 1999), reflects the extent to whic
 h individuals feel able to speak up, ask for help, challenge ideas, a
 nd collaborate effectively.</p><p>A growing body of research demonstr
 ates that psychological safety:</p><ul>  <li>Enhances learning from m
 istakes</li>  <li>Improves innovation and process effectiveness</li> 
  <li>Increases employee engagement</li>  <li>Facilitates knowledge sh
 aring and open communication</li>  <li>Supports team and organization
 al performance</li></ul><p>As such, psychological safety has become a
  foundational concept in organizational behavior and management resea
 rch.</p><p>However, despite this strong evidence, current debates rem
 ain largely grounded in&nbsp;Western-centric assumptions, particularl
 y those derived from studies conducted in the United States and simil
 ar cultural contexts. Moreover, most research on psychological safety
  has been done in the context of health delivery (Edmondson &amp; Bra
 nsby, 2023), a setting that has typical organizational and institutio
 nal characteristics.</p><p>As a result, important questions arise reg
 arding the&nbsp;contextual influences on the understanding and effect
 s of psychological safety. Much of our current understanding may be c
 onstrained by implicit cultural assumptions, limiting its applicabili
 ty in diverse global settings.</p><p>This conference seeks to advance
  research on psychological safety by integrating&nbsp;cross-cultural 
 perspectives with organizational practice. By critically examining ho
 w psychological safety is shaped by cross-cultural and other contextu
 al conditions (e.g., organizational values) , we aim to foster new in
 sights that move beyond dominant Western frameworks and contribute to
  more inclusive, context-sensitive, and globally relevant theories an
 d practices.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Towards a Cross-Cultural and Co
 ntext-Sensitive Understanding</strong></p><p>An increasing number of 
 scholars have called for a deeper examination of psychological safety
  across cultures and contexts. While recent research conducted outsid
 e North America and beyond typical business settings confirms many of
  its positive effects, significant gaps remain.</p><p>In particular:<
 /p><ul>  <li>We lack comparative studies examining psychological safe
 ty across multiple countries</li>  <li>The influence of cultural and 
 organizational norms on interpersonal risk-taking remains insufficien
 tly understood</li>  <li>It is unclear whether existing definitions a
 nd measurement instruments are universally valid</li>  <li>Limited at
 tention has been paid to contexts characterized by high power distanc
 e or lower tolerance for risk</li>  <li>Conceptual development is nee
 ded regarding context-sensitive mechanisms regarding the development 
 and effects of psychological safety</li></ul><p>These gaps highlight 
 the need to further a cross-cultural and context-sensitive understand
 ing of the forms, emergence, erosion, and effects of psychological sa
 fety.</p><p>Through this Call for Papers, we invite contributions tha
 t explore and advance research on psychological safety across culture
 s and contexts. We particularly encourage submissions that integrate&
 nbsp;theoretical, empirical, and practical perspectives.</p><p><br></
 p><p><strong>Example Questions for Consideration</strong></p><p>Contr
 ibutions may address, but are not limited to, the following questions
 :</p><ul>  <li>How do the form, emergence, erosion and effect of psyc
 hological safety vary across cultural and institutional contexts?</li
 >  <li>What are the key mechanisms that explain differences in the de
 velopment and effects of psychological safety across contexts?</li>  
 <li>To what extent is psychological safety a culturally bound versus 
 a universal construct?</li>  <li>How do cultural dimensions and conte
 xtual conditions (e.g., power distance, collectivism, uncertainty avo
 idance) or cultural values (e.g., the Schwarz typology of values) sha
 pe interpersonal risk-taking?</li>  <li>Should the definition and mea
 surement of psychological safety be adapted to different cultural set
 tings?</li>  <li>How do individuals perceive and navigate interperson
 al risk in high power-distance environments?</li>  <li>What are effec
 tive strategies for fostering psychological safety in multicultural a
 nd global teams?</li>  <li>How do leadership styles and organizationa
 l structures influence psychological safety across cultures?</li>  <l
 i>How can different organizations balance psychological safety with a
 ccountability, hierarchy, and performance demands?</li>  <li>What met
 hodological approaches are best suited for studying psychological saf
 ety in cross-cultural and context-sensitive research?</li>  <li>How d
 o cultural norms influence speaking-up climates and employee voice?</
 li>  <li>What role does psychological safety play in global collabora
 tion, innovation, and learning?</li>  <li>How can organizations desig
 n interventions that are sensitive to cultural differences while prom
 oting inclusive environments?</li></ul><p><strong>Conference Fees</st
 rong></p><p>Full conference fee €350<br>PhD students fee €250</p>
 <p><strong>Organizing Committee</strong></p><p>Irina Prosviriakova, <
 a data-email-address="i.prosviriakova@student.vu.nl" href="mailto:i.p
 rosviriakova@student.vu.nl">i.prosviriakova@student.vu.nl</a><br>Prof
 . dr. Svetlana Khapova, <a data-email-address="s.n.khapova@vu.nl" hre
 f="mailto:s.n.khapova@vu.nl">s.n.khapova@vu.nl</a><br>Dr. Steven van 
 Baarle, <a data-email-address="s.van.baarle@vu.nl" href="mailto:s.van
 .baarle@vu.nl">s.van.baarle@vu.nl</a><br>Prof. dr.ir. Elco van Burg, 
 <a data-email-address="elco.van.burg@vu.nl" href="mailto:elco.van.bur
 g@vu.nl">elco.van.burg@vu.nl</a><br>Dr. Sheba Agarwal, <a data-email-
 address="s.agarwal@vu.nl" href="mailto:s.agarwal@vu.nl">s.agarwal@vu.
 nl</a></p> </body> </html>
DESCRIPTION: We are excited to announce that the international confere
 nce&nbsp;Psychological Safety Across Cultures and Contexts&nbsp;will 
 be held in Amsterdam on 29–30 September 2026. <h3>Keynote Speaker<b
 r></h3><strong>Amy Edmondson (Harvard Business School)</strong><br><b
 r><br>This conference aims to advance contemporary thinking on psycho
 logical safety by examining its cultural foundations and its relevanc
 e across diverse organizational and societal contexts. We invite rese
 archers from around the world working on psychological safety to subm
 it and present their research.<br><strong>Important Dates</strong><ul
 >  <li>Submission deadline for Abstracts (1000 words):&nbsp;30 May 20
 26</li>  <li>Notification of acceptance:&nbsp;15 June 2026</li>  <li>
 Submission deadline for Full Papers: 1 September 2026</li>  <li>Confe
 rence dates:&nbsp;29–30 September 2026</li></ul><br><h3><strong>Sub
 mission Details</strong></h3>Please submit your abstracts by sending 
 them to &nbsp;<a data-email-address="leadershipacademy@vu.nl" href="m
 ailto:leadershipacademy@vu.nl">leadershipacademy@vu.nl</a><br><strong
 >Background and Motivation</strong>Creating psychologically safe envi
 ronments for employees is widely regarded as a central priority in co
 ntemporary organizations. Psychological safety, defined as a shared b
 elief about the consequences of taking interpersonal risks in a given
  context (Edmondson, 1999), reflects the extent to which individuals 
 feel able to speak up, ask for help, challenge ideas, and collaborate
  effectively.A growing body of research demonstrates that psychologic
 al safety:<ul>  <li>Enhances learning from mistakes</li>  <li>Improve
 s innovation and process effectiveness</li>  <li>Increases employee e
 ngagement</li>  <li>Facilitates knowledge sharing and open communicat
 ion</li>  <li>Supports team and organizational performance</li></ul>A
 s such, psychological safety has become a foundational concept in org
 anizational behavior and management research.However, despite this st
 rong evidence, current debates remain largely grounded in&nbsp;Wester
 n-centric assumptions, particularly those derived from studies conduc
 ted in the United States and similar cultural contexts. Moreover, mos
 t research on psychological safety has been done in the context of he
 alth delivery (Edmondson &amp; Bransby, 2023), a setting that has typ
 ical organizational and institutional characteristics.As a result, im
 portant questions arise regarding the&nbsp;contextual influences on t
 he understanding and effects of psychological safety. Much of our cur
 rent understanding may be constrained by implicit cultural assumption
 s, limiting its applicability in diverse global settings.This confere
 nce seeks to advance research on psychological safety by integrating&
 nbsp;cross-cultural perspectives with organizational practice. By cri
 tically examining how psychological safety is shaped by cross-cultura
 l and other contextual conditions (e.g., organizational values) , we 
 aim to foster new insights that move beyond dominant Western framewor
 ks and contribute to more inclusive, context-sensitive, and globally 
 relevant theories and practices.<br><strong>Towards a Cross-Cultural 
 and Context-Sensitive Understanding</strong>An increasing number of s
 cholars have called for a deeper examination of psychological safety 
 across cultures and contexts. While recent research conducted outside
  North America and beyond typical business settings confirms many of 
 its positive effects, significant gaps remain.In particular:<ul>  <li
 >We lack comparative studies examining psychological safety across mu
 ltiple countries</li>  <li>The influence of cultural and organization
 al norms on interpersonal risk-taking remains insufficiently understo
 od</li>  <li>It is unclear whether existing definitions and measureme
 nt instruments are universally valid</li>  <li>Limited attention has 
 been paid to contexts characterized by high power distance or lower t
 olerance for risk</li>  <li>Conceptual development is needed regardin
 g context-sensitive mechanisms regarding the development and effects 
 of psychological safety</li></ul>These gaps highlight the need to fur
 ther a cross-cultural and context-sensitive understanding of the form
 s, emergence, erosion, and effects of psychological safety.Through th
 is Call for Papers, we invite contributions that explore and advance 
 research on psychological safety across cultures and contexts. We par
 ticularly encourage submissions that integrate&nbsp;theoretical, empi
 rical, and practical perspectives.<br><strong>Example Questions for C
 onsideration</strong>Contributions may address, but are not limited t
 o, the following questions:<ul>  <li>How do the form, emergence, eros
 ion and effect of psychological safety vary across cultural and insti
 tutional contexts?</li>  <li>What are the key mechanisms that explain
  differences in the development and effects of psychological safety a
 cross contexts?</li>  <li>To what extent is psychological safety a cu
 lturally bound versus a universal construct?</li>  <li>How do cultura
 l dimensions and contextual conditions (e.g., power distance, collect
 ivism, uncertainty avoidance) or cultural values (e.g., the Schwarz t
 ypology of values) shape interpersonal risk-taking?</li>  <li>Should 
 the definition and measurement of psychological safety be adapted to 
 different cultural settings?</li>  <li>How do individuals perceive an
 d navigate interpersonal risk in high power-distance environments?</l
 i>  <li>What are effective strategies for fostering psychological saf
 ety in multicultural and global teams?</li>  <li>How do leadership st
 yles and organizational structures influence psychological safety acr
 oss cultures?</li>  <li>How can different organizations balance psych
 ological safety with accountability, hierarchy, and performance deman
 ds?</li>  <li>What methodological approaches are best suited for stud
 ying psychological safety in cross-cultural and context-sensitive res
 earch?</li>  <li>How do cultural norms influence speaking-up climates
  and employee voice?</li>  <li>What role does psychological safety pl
 ay in global collaboration, innovation, and learning?</li>  <li>How c
 an organizations design interventions that are sensitive to cultural 
 differences while promoting inclusive environments?</li></ul><strong>
 Conference Fees</strong>Full conference fee €350<br>PhD students fe
 e €250<strong>Organizing Committee</strong>Irina Prosviriakova, <a 
 data-email-address="i.prosviriakova@student.vu.nl" href="mailto:i.pro
 sviriakova@student.vu.nl">i.prosviriakova@student.vu.nl</a><br>Prof. 
 dr. Svetlana Khapova, <a data-email-address="s.n.khapova@vu.nl" href=
 "mailto:s.n.khapova@vu.nl">s.n.khapova@vu.nl</a><br>Dr. Steven van Ba
 arle, <a data-email-address="s.van.baarle@vu.nl" href="mailto:s.van.b
 aarle@vu.nl">s.van.baarle@vu.nl</a><br>Prof. dr.ir. Elco van Burg, <a
  data-email-address="elco.van.burg@vu.nl" href="mailto:elco.van.burg@
 vu.nl">elco.van.burg@vu.nl</a><br>Dr. Sheba Agarwal, <a data-email-ad
 dress="s.agarwal@vu.nl" href="mailto:s.agarwal@vu.nl">s.agarwal@vu.nl
 </a>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
