BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam//NONSGML v1.0//EN
NAME:PhD defence S. Kateb
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20260904T134500
DTEND:20260904T151500
DTSTAMP:20260904T134500
UID:phd-defence-s-kateb@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573
CREATED:20260825T025120
LOCATION:Hoofdgebouw, Aula, 1105, De Boelelaan, 1081 HV, Amsterdam
SUMMARY:PhD defence S. Kateb
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html: <html> <body> <p><p>Paving through the C
 ovid-19 Crisis</p></p> <h3><strong>How do you provide good care in ti
 mes of crisis?</strong></h3><p><strong>Physical presence is indispens
 able for good care during a prolonged crisis That is the conclusion o
 f organisational scholar Sanaz Kateb, who studied social care organis
 ations in Amsterdam during the COVID-19 crisis. When care professiona
 ls and clients saw each other less often, misunderstandings arose mor
 e quickly and it became harder to properly assess what people needed.
  As a result, pressure on both clients and professionals increased.</
 strong></p><p>Kateb examined how care organisations had to adapt thei
 r work when COVID-19 measures profoundly changed day-to-day care. The
 se organisations support people in vulnerable situations, such as tho
 se without a fixed place to live, people living in poverty or people 
 with mental health difficulties. She interviewed care professionals a
 nd clients, and observed up close how care was provided at different 
 moments during the pandemic. Kateb: “This allowed me to follow how 
 organisations adapted their ways of working over time, and what impac
 t this had on clients, professionals and the way care was organised.�
 ��</p><p>While many people quickly switched to digital tools to stay 
 in touch during the COVID-19 crisis, Kateb studied how social care or
 ganisations used these tools in their care provision. “Digital tool
 s could support care and offered new possibilities, but they could no
 t fully replace personal contact. Good care during a prolonged crisis
  therefore requires flexibility as well as sufficient room for human 
 proximity. The research shows this clearly.”</p><p>According to Kat
 eb, this is an important lesson for future crises. Organisations and 
 policymakers should not only introduce crisis measures quickly, but a
 lso keep testing them against practice. “Good care in times of cris
 is means not only acting quickly, but also repeatedly asking what peo
 ple need, what is working and where measures are unintentionally crea
 ting new problems.”</p><p>More information on the <a href="https://
 hdl.handle.net/1871.1/34735dad-f564-4cd2-9fd2-95ae9c927b18">thesis</a
 ></p> </body> </html>
DESCRIPTION: Paving through the Covid-19 Crisis <h3><strong>How do you
  provide good care in times of crisis?</strong></h3><strong>Physical 
 presence is indispensable for good care during a prolonged crisis Tha
 t is the conclusion of organisational scholar Sanaz Kateb, who studie
 d social care organisations in Amsterdam during the COVID-19 crisis. 
 When care professionals and clients saw each other less often, misund
 erstandings arose more quickly and it became harder to properly asses
 s what people needed. As a result, pressure on both clients and profe
 ssionals increased.</strong>Kateb examined how care organisations had
  to adapt their work when COVID-19 measures profoundly changed day-to
 -day care. These organisations support people in vulnerable situation
 s, such as those without a fixed place to live, people living in pove
 rty or people with mental health difficulties. She interviewed care p
 rofessionals and clients, and observed up close how care was provided
  at different moments during the pandemic. Kateb: “This allowed me 
 to follow how organisations adapted their ways of working over time, 
 and what impact this had on clients, professionals and the way care w
 as organised.”While many people quickly switched to digital tools t
 o stay in touch during the COVID-19 crisis, Kateb studied how social 
 care organisations used these tools in their care provision. “Digit
 al tools could support care and offered new possibilities, but they c
 ould not fully replace personal contact. Good care during a prolonged
  crisis therefore requires flexibility as well as sufficient room for
  human proximity. The research shows this clearly.”According to Kat
 eb, this is an important lesson for future crises. Organisations and 
 policymakers should not only introduce crisis measures quickly, but a
 lso keep testing them against practice. “Good care in times of cris
 is means not only acting quickly, but also repeatedly asking what peo
 ple need, what is working and where measures are unintentionally crea
 ting new problems.”More information on the <a href="https://hdl.han
 dle.net/1871.1/34735dad-f564-4cd2-9fd2-95ae9c927b18">thesis</a>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
