A summary and analysis of the evidence
Do you want to write a systematic review, an article, or a grant application for which a literature review is required? The (medical) information specialists at the University Library are experts at literature reviews and are happy to give you advice, from honing the research question to publishing the finished article. We provide assistance to VU/VUmc researchers and staff from all subject areas. We guarantee quality, and an efficient approach that saves researchers a great deal of time.
Steps in a systematic review
A systematic review provides a summary and an analysis of the evidence from all good scientific studies relating to a predefined research question. The researcher can then use the systematic review to identify and evaluate the evidence.
- Analysing and refining the research question (using a PICO model, for example).
- Selecting the search terms and the databases to be consulted.
- Removing duplicates from the search results obtained from the various databases.
- Keeping a logbook of the search strategy, to ensure it can be reproduced.
- Supplying a paragraph on the methodology for the article, as well as tables describing the search strategies.
For what steps can we provide advice?
- Selecting articles using Rayyan, a free selection tool; see also the Rayyan LibGuide.
- Bibliographic management using tools such as EndNote and Mendeley.
- Selecting the right journal for your publication.
- Open access publishing: check the VU Journal Publishing Guide.
- Publishing the systematic review protocol in the Prospero register to prevent redundant research.
- Creating an ORCID; the how and why of an ORCID.
- Critical appraisal tools: Cochrane Netherlands, CEBM Oxford, CASP, QUADAS 2 (diagnostic accuracy) and the Joanna Briggs Institute. For a non-exhaustive list: University of South Australia.
- List of the various types of reviews (e.g. scoping reviews).
- How to get the PDF.
- For advice about statistics and critical appraisal, contact the Epidemiology and Data Science (EDS).
- We help students as well if their research is intended for publication.
Naming the information specialist as co-author
The information specialist has final responsibility for the search method. For that reason, we ask that he or she be named as co-author of the systematic review article. After publication, the information specialist will be available to answer questions about the search method.
Quality standards for systematic reviews
The medical information specialists in the University Library conduct systematic reviews according to professional guidelines such as the Cochrane Handbook and the Standards for systematic reviews, IoM. Our contribution is essential, as demonstrated by research from Koffel (2015) and Rethlefsen et al. (2015).
Avoid bias: do not limit to a time frame or language, because this will introduce ‘publication bias’ into the research. See: Cochrane Handbook, 2019.
To ensure good collaboration, we expect researchers to:
- Think carefully in advance about the research question and the inclusion and exclusion criteria;
- Read the following LibGuides: Searching in PubMed; Systematische Reviews; and the Rayyan LibGuide (McGill University);
- Be familiar with the Prisma Statement and bibliographic management.
Scheduling an appointment
The number of scientific publications in which the information specialists at the University Library have been involved, as of December 2021:
• Named as co-author in 270 publications (2004–2021)
• Received an acknowledgment in 105 publications (2011–2021)
Our team of medical information specialists
Published research in which we are mentioned (as per 3 October 2019):
• in 204 publications as co-author (2004-2019)
• in 91 publications with an acknowledgment (2011-2019)